Tag: coronavirus

  • US shifts to speed vaccinations; won’t hold back second doses

    US shifts to speed vaccinations; won’t hold back second doses

    As of Monday morning, the government had distributed about 25.5 million doses to states, U.S. territories and major cities.

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Barely a month into a mass vaccination campaign to stop the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trump administration unexpectedly shifted gears Tuesday to speed the delivery of shots. A slow start had triggered widespread concern from states and public health officials.

    Now, Health and Human Services Alex Azar has announced two major changes. First, the government will no longer hold back required second doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, practically doubling supply. Second, states should immediately start vaccinating other groups lower down the priority scale, including people age 65 and older, and younger people with certain health problems.

    The move better aligns the outgoing administration with the new Biden-Harris team. On Friday, President-elect Joe Biden said he will rapidly release most available vaccine doses to protect more people. He said he supported immediately releasing vaccines that health authorities were holding back out of caution, to guarantee they would be available for people needing their second dose.

    “We had been holding back second doses as a safety stock,” Azar said on ABC. “We now believe that our manufacturing is predictable enough that we can ensure second doses are available for people from ongoing production. So everything is now available to our states and our health care providers.”

    Simultaneously, he gave states the green light to dramatically expand the pool of people eligible to receive vaccines.

    “We are calling on our governors to now vaccinate people aged 65 and over, and under age 65 with a (health condition) because we have got to expand the group,” he said.

    As of Monday morning, the government had distributed about 25.5 million doses to states, U.S. territories and major cities. But only about 9 million people had received their first shot. That means only about 35% of the available vaccines had been administered.

    Initially, the shots were going to health care workers and nursing home residents. Those 75 and older were next in line. But problems arose even in vaccinating that limited pool of people. Some hospital and nursing home workers have been hesitant to get the vaccine. Scheduling issues created delays in getting shots to nursing homes.

    Some states, including Arizona, have or are planning to open up mass vaccination centers, aiming to inoculate thousands of people a day in a single location. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis opened up vaccinations to people 65 and older. In other states, local health authorities have started asking residents 65 an older to register, in anticipation the vaccination campaign would be expanded.

    “We’ve got to get to more channels of administration,” said Azar. “We’ve got to get it to pharmacies, get it to community health centers.

    “We will deploy teams to support states doing mass vaccination efforts if they wish to do so,” he added.

    Although Azar said the shift was a natural evolution of the Trump administration’s efforts, as recently as Friday he had raised questions about whether Biden’s call to accelerate supplies was prudent. The Trump administration, which directed a crash effort to develop and manufacture vaccines, is hoping to avoid a repeat of earlier debacles with coronavirus testing. Dubbed “Operation Warp Speed,” the effort has produced two highly effective vaccines, with more on the way.

    Each state has its own plan for who should be vaccinated, based on recommendations from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC recommendations give first priority to health care workers and nursing home residents.

    But the slow pace of the vaccine rollout has frustrated many Americans at a time when the coronavirus death toll has continued to rise. More than 376,000 people have died, according to the Johns Hopkins database.

    U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams said hundreds of thousands of people are getting vaccinated every day across the nation, but the pace of inoculations needs to improve.

    “We’re in a race against this virus and quite frankly, we’re behind,” Adams told “Fox & Friends.” “The good news is that 700,000 people are getting vaccinated every single day. We’re going to hit 1 million people and we need to continue to pick up that pace.”

    In Philadelphia, health department spokesman James Garrow, said the new direction from Washington will take time to figure out before it impacts vaccine distribution in the city. “This is a wholesale change out of the blue after months of planning,” Garrow said.

    Washington, D.C. on Monday opened up vaccines to residents 65 years and older and the system was quickly overwhelmed. People reported problems with the website for registration and hours-long waits to register by phone. A message on the city’s website Tuesday morning read, “All 6,700 of the available vaccination appointments for the week of 1/11/21 were filled.”

    Biden is expected to give a speech Thursday outlining his plan to speed vaccines to more people in the first part of his administration. His transition team has vowed to release as many vaccine doses as possible, rather than continuing the Trump administration policy of holding back millions of doses to ensure there would be enough supply to allow those getting the first shot to get a second one.

    The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine requires a second shot about three weeks after the first vaccination. Another vaccine, this one produced by Moderna, requires a second shot about four weeks afterward. One-shot vaccines are still undergoing testing.

    ___

    AP writers Candice Choi in New York and Carole Feldman in Washington contributed.

  • COVID vaccines available for Louisiana residents at these Miss-Lou area pharmacies

    COVID vaccines available for Louisiana residents at these Miss-Lou area pharmacies

    Starting the week of January 4, Louisiana will receive the first very limited doses of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine that will be available at approximately 100 pharmacies across the state.

    These vaccines will be available only for:

    • People 70 years old and above
    • Ambulatory/outpatient care personnel
    • People being treated for end stage renal disease (patients on dialysis)
    • Schools of allied health students/residents/staff
    • Home agency patients and personnel

    In the Miss-Lou area, participating pharmacies include:

    Concordia Parish – Book’s Pharmacy in Vidalia  (318) 414-2616 

    Franklin Parish – K & S Drugs in Winnsboro  (318) 435-7858

    Rapides Parish – Holloway Pharmacy in Pineville  (318) 466-3113

    West Feliciana Parish – St. Francisville Pharmacy  (225) 245-5141

    Click HERE for Vaccine locations in the rest of Louisiana.

    Patients must contact a participating pharmacy and make an appointment at the pharmacy. Patients who arrive without an appointment will not be vaccinated. Vaccinations are BY APPOINTMENT ONLY. Do not arrive at a location without an appointment.

  • Louisiana lieutenant governor tests positive for COVID-19

    Louisiana lieutenant governor tests positive for COVID-19

    BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Lt. Gov. Billy Nungesser said he has COVID-19 and is resting at home with mild symptoms, becoming Louisiana’s fourth statewide elected official to test positive for the coronavirus disease.

    Nungesser, a Republican in his second term as lieutenant governor, confirmed in a Wednesday night Twitter post that he tested positive for COVID-19.

    “Thank you to everyone for your prayers. Today, I tested positive for #COVID but have very mild symptoms. Will be resting up and feeling better soon! As we head into the holidays, my thoughts and prayers are with all those affected by COVID,” he tweeted.

    Nungesser told The News-Star that he’s “reaching out to everybody I’ve seen in the last few days” to notify them of his infection. He said his mild symptoms include a fever, but no breathing problems.

    The lieutenant governor joins three other Republican statewide elected officials in Louisiana who have previously had COVID-19 and have since recovered: U.S. Sen. Bill Cassidy, Attorney General Jeff Landry and Treasurer John Schroder.

  • Second Trump-Biden debate to be virtual due to Trump’s COVID-19

    Second Trump-Biden debate to be virtual due to Trump’s COVID-19

    The nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates debates made the announcement Thursday morning.

     

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The second presidential debate between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden will take place virtually amid the fallout from the president’s diagnosis of COVID-19.

    The candidates will “participate from separate remote locations,” while the participants and moderator remain in Miami, the commission said.

    Trump was diagnosed with the coronavirus a week ago and but in a Tuesday tweet said he looked forward to debating Biden on stage in Miami, “It will be great!” he tweeted.

    Biden, for his part, said he and Trump “shouldn’t have a debate” as long as the president remains COVID positive.

    Biden told reporters in Pennsylvania that he was “looking forward to being able to debate him” but said “we’re going to have to follow very strict guidelines.”

    Trump fell ill with the virus last Thursday, just 48 hours after debating Biden in person for the first time in Cleveland. While the two candidates remained a dozen feet apart during the debate, Trump’s infection sparked health concerns for Biden and sent him to undergo multiple COVID-19 tests before returning to the campaign trail.

    Trump was still contagious with the virus when he was discharged from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on Monday but his doctors have not provided any detailed update on his status. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, those with mild to moderate symptoms of COVID-19 can be contagious for as many as — and should isolate for at least — 10 days.

  • FDA Expands Hand Sanitizer Danger List To More Than 100 Products

    FDA Expands Hand Sanitizer Danger List To More Than 100 Products

    Hand sanitizer products testing positive for methanol

    FDA is warning consumers and health care providers that the agency has seen a sharp increase in hand sanitizer products that are labeled to contain ethanol (also known as ethyl alcohol) but that have tested positive for methanol contamination. Methanol, or wood alcohol, is a substance that can be toxic when absorbed through the skin or ingested and can be life-threatening when ingested.

    The agency is aware of adults and children ingesting hand sanitizer products contaminated with methanol that has led to recent adverse events including blindness, hospitalizations and death.

    Methanol is not an acceptable ingredient for hand sanitizers and must not be used due to its toxic effects. FDA’s investigation of methanol in certain hand sanitizers is ongoing. The agency will provide additional information as it becomes available.

    Consumers who have been exposed to hand sanitizer containing methanol and are experiencing symptoms should seek immediate treatment for potential reversal of toxic effects of methanol poisoning. Substantial methanol exposure can result in nausea, vomiting, headache, blurred vision, permanent blindness, seizures, coma, permanent damage to the nervous system or death. Although all persons using these products on their hands are at risk for methanol poisoning, young children who accidently ingest these products and adolescents and adults who drink these products as an alcohol (ethanol) substitute, are most at risk.

    FDA reminds consumers to wash their hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, especially after going to the bathroom; before eating; and after coughing, sneezing, or blowing one’s nose. If soap and water are not readily available, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend consumers use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer that contains at least 60 percent ethanol (also referred to as ethyl alcohol).

    FDA remains vigilant and will continue to take action when quality issues arise with hand sanitizers. The agency is especially concerned with:

    • The dangers of drinking any hand sanitizer under any conditions. While hand sanitizers with possible methanol contamination are more life-threatening than those that are not contaminated, FDA urges consumers not to drink any of these products.
    • Certain hand sanitizers that may not contain a sufficient amount of ethyl alcohol or isopropyl alcohol.
    • Hand sanitizers that are sold or offered for sale with false and misleading, unproven claims that they can prevent the spread of viruses such as COVID-19, including claims that they can provide prolonged protection (e.g., for up to 24-hours).
    • Products that are fraudulently marketed as “FDA-approved” since there are no hand sanitizers approved by FDA.
    • Products packaged to appear as drinks, candy or liquor bottles, as well as products marketed as drinks or cocktails because their appearance could result in accidental ingestion or encourage ingestion. Children are particularly at risk with these products since ingesting only a small amount of hand sanitizer may be lethal in a young child.
    • Products labeled with harmful or poisonous ingredients, such as methanol.

    FDA is aware of reports of adverse events associated with hand sanitizer products. FDA encourages health care professionals, consumers and patients to report adverse events or quality problems experienced with the use of hand sanitizers to FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program (please provide the agency with as much information as possible to identify the product):

    • Complete and submit the report online; or
    • Download and complete the form, then submit it via fax at 1-800-FDA-0178.

    Full list of products as of August 5th, 2020

    The following chart outlines the information on hand sanitizer labels for consumers to use to identify a product that:

    • Has been tested by FDA and found to contain methanol.
    • Is labeled to contain methanol.
    • Has been tested and is found to have microbial contamination.
    • Is being recalled by the manufacturer or distributor.
    • Is subpotent, meaning it has less than the required amount of ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol or benzalkonium chloride.
    • Is purportedly made at the same facility as products that have been tested by FDA and found to contain methanol.

    FDA advises consumers not to use hand sanitizers from these companies, or products with these names:

     

    Alcohol Antiseptic 62% Hand Sanitizer 08/03/2020
    Quimica Magna de Mexico SA de CV
    Alcohol Antiseptic 65% Hand Sanitizer; Alcohol Antiseptic 70% Hand Sanitizer 08/03/2020 Inflatables LLC
    All-Clean Hand Sanitizer 07/02/2020*
    All Clean Natural LTD
    Andy’s 07/08/2020
    Brand Name Distributors
    Andy’s Best 07/08/2020
    Brand Name Distributors
    Assured Aloe 07/08/2020
    Greenbrier International Inc.
    Assured Instant Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer with Aloe and Moisturizers 07/28/2020
    Albek de Mexico SA de CV
    Assured Instant Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer with Vitamin E and Aloe 07/28/2020
    Albek de Mexico SA de CV
    Assured Instant Hand Sanitizer (Aloe and Moisturizers) 07/08/2020
    Greenbrier International Inc.
    Assured Instant Hand Sanitizer (Vitamin E and Aloe) 07/08/2020
    Greenbrier International Inc.
    Assured Instant Hand Sanitizer Aloe and Moisturizers 07/08/2020
    Greenbrier International Inc.
    Assured Instant Hand Sanitizer Vitamin E and Aloe 07/08/2020
    Greenbrier International Inc.
    Be Safe Hand Sanitizer 07/02/2020
    BeSafe Industries LLC
    Bernal Hand Sanitizer 08/03/2020 Inflatables LLC
    Bersih Antiseptic Alcohol 70% Topical Solution hand sanitizer 07/02/2020 Astrum LLC
    Bersih Hand Sanitizer Gel Fragrance Free 07/02/2020
    Private D Capital Group Corp., Human Choice LLC and RediBag USA Astrum LLC
    bio aaa Advance Hand Sanitizer 07/06/2020
    Payless Janitorial Corporation
    BLUMEN Advanced Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Advanced Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Advanced Hand Sanitizer Aloe 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    Blumen Advanced Hand Sanitizer Aloe, with 70% alcohol 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Advanced Hand Sanitizer Clear 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    Blumen Advanced Hand Sanitizer Lavender, with 70% alcohol 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Clear 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Clear 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    Blumen Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Clear Ethyl Alcohol 70% 07/08/2020
    BLUMEN Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Lavender 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Aloe Advanced Hand Sanitizer, with 70 Alcohol 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Aloe Advanced Hand Sanitizer, with 70 Alcohol 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    Blumen Antibacterial Fresh Citrus Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Clear Advanced Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Clear Advanced Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    Blumen Clear Advanced Hand Sanitizer with 70% Alcohol 07/08/2020
    BLUMEN Clear Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Clear Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Aloe 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Clear Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Lavender 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Clear LEAR Advanced Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Clear LEAR Advanced Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    Blumen Hand Sanitizer Fresh Citrus 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Instant Hand Sanitizer Aloe Vera 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    BLUMEN Instant Hand Sanitizer Fragrance Free 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    Born Basic. Anti-Bac Hand Sanitizer 65% Alcohol 07/14/2020
    Scent Theory Products LLC
    Born Basic. Anti-Bac Hand Sanitizer 70% alcohol 07/14/2020
    Scent Theory Products LLC
    Britz Hand Sanitizer Ethyl Alcohol 70% 07/02/2020
    Soflo Urban Team LLC
    Cavalry 07/14/2020
    Cavalry Sanitizers LLC
    Clean Humans Hand Sanitizer 08/03/2020
    CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 75% Alcohol 07/02/2020* ESPMEX LLC
    CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol 07/02/2020* ESPMEX LLC
    CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol 07/02/2020* ESPMEX LLC
    Cleaner Hand Sanitizer Rinse Free 70% 07/02/2020
    Liberty International Distributors
    Command Gel AntiBac Instant hand sanitizer 08/03/2020
    Roque Plast SA de CV
    DAESI Hand Sanitizer 07/10/2020
    Yara Elena De La Garza Perez Nieto
    Datsen Hand Sanitizer 08/03/2020
    dgreen Advanced Hand Sanitizer Antibacterial Gel 08/03/2020 Biokaab Inc.
    dgreen Advanced Sanitizer Alcohol Free 08/03/2020 Biokaab Inc.
    Earths Amenities Instant Unscented Hand Sanitizer with Aloe Vera Advanced 07/08/2020 Earths Amenities
    ENLIVEN Hand Sanitizing Gel 07/14/2020
    Procurement Services LLC
    Esk Biochem Hand Sanitizer 07/02/2020* EskBiochem
    foamyiQ Lemon Blossom Hand Sanitizer 08/03/2020
    GelBact Hand Sanitizer 07/30/2020
    Pacific Coast Global Inc. and Tritanium Labs LLC
    Greenfrog Hand Sanitizer 08/03/2020
    Notarika SA de CV
    Greenfrog Hand Sanitizing wipes 08/03/2020
    Notarika SA de CV
    Hand Sanitizer 08/03/2020 Biokaab Inc.
    Hand Sanitizer 07/30/2020
    Pacific Coast Global Inc. and Tritanium Labs LLC
    Hand Sanitizer Agavespa Skincare 07/08/2020
    Vidanos Easy Cleaning Rentals
    Hand Sanitizer Disinfectant Gel 70% Ethyl Alcohol 07/15/2020
    Resource Recovery and Trading LLC
    Hand Sanitizer Disinfectant Gel 70% Ethyl Alcohol Rinse Free Hand Rub 07/15/2020
    Resource Recovery and Trading LLC
    Hand Sanitizer Gel 08/03/2020 Biokaab Inc.
    Hand Sanitizer Gel Alcohol 70% 07/10/2020
    Wet Look Janitorial and Gardening Corp.
    Hand sanitizer Gel Unscented 70% Alcohol 07/02/2020
    Grupo Insoma, S.A.P.I de CV
    Handzer Hand Sanitizer Rinse Free 07/02/2020
    Liberty International Distributors
    Hello Kitty Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    Herbacil Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer 70% Alcohol 07/24/2020 INBC Trading LLC
    Herbacil Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer 70% Alcohol 07/24/2020 INBC Trading LLC
    Herbacil Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer 70% Alcohol 07/24/2020 INBC Trading LLC
    Jaloma Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer Ethyl Alcohol 62% with Vitamin E 7/24/2020
    Laboratorios Jaloma SA de CV
    KLAR AND DANVER Instant Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    Greenbrier International Inc.
    KLAR and DANVER Instant Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    Greenbrier International Inc.
    Kleanz Antibacterial Hand Sanitizer Advanced 07/02/2020 Up in the Lab
    Lavar 70 Gel Hand Sanitizer 07/02/2020*
    Blue Ridge Southern Supply LLC
    Leiper’s Fork Distillery Bulk Disinfectant per 5 gallon and Leiper’s Fork Distillery 16 oz bottle 7/24/2020
    Lite ’n Foamy Lemon Blossom Hand Sanitizer 08/03/2020
    LumiSkin Advance Hand Sanitizer 16 oz 07/06/2020
    Soflo Urban Team LLC
    LumiSkin Advance Hand Sanitizer 4 oz 07/06/2020
    Soflo Urban Team LLC
    Lux Eoi Hand Sanitizing Gel 07/14/2020
    Procurement Services LLC
    Medicare Alcohol Antiseptic Topical Solution 07/30/2020
    Healthy Food and Nutrition Lab
    Modesa Instant Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer with Moisturizers and Aloe Vera 07/28/2020
    Albek de Mexico SA de CV
    Modesa Instant Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer with Moisturizers and Vitamin E 07/28/2020
    Albek de Mexico SA de CV
    MODESA Instant Hand Sanitizer Moisturizers and Vitamin E 07/08/2020
    Midwood Brands LLC
    Mystic Shield Protection hand sanitizer 07/02/2020
    Transliquid Technologies LLC
    NeoNatural 07/08/2020
    Brand Name Distributors
    NEXT Hand Sanitizer 07/28/2020
    Genomma Lab USA
    NuuxSan Instant Antibacterial Hand Sanitizer 07/28/2020
    Albek de Mexico SA de CV
    NuuxSan Instant Hand Sanitizer 07/28/2020
    Albek de Mexico SA de CV
    Optimus Instant Hand Sanitizer 07/21/2020 Liq-E S.A. de CV
    Optimus Instant Hand Sanitizer 7/21/2020 Liq-E S.A. de CV
    Optimus Lubricants Instant Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020 Liq-E S.A. de CV
    Parabola Hand Sanitizer 07/02/2020
    Soflo Urban Team LLC
    Plus Advanced 07/08/2020
    Brand Name Distributors
    Purity Advanced Hand Sanitizer 07/02/2020
    Human Choice LLC
    QualitaMed Hand Sanitizer 07/06/2020
    QualitaMed Corp.
    Saniderm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 07/02/2020* Polarized LLC
    Sayab Antisepctic Hand Sanitizer 100 07/30/2020
    Scent Theory – Keep It Clean – Pure Clean Anti-bacterial Hand Sanitizer 07/14/2020
    Scent Theory Products LLC
    Scent Theory – Keep It Clean – Pure Clean Anti-bacterial Hand Sanitizer 07/14/2020
    Scent Theory Products Inc.
    Selecto Hand Sanitizer 07/10/2020
    Bodega Latina Corp.
    Shine and Clean Hand Sanitizer 07/10/2020
    Maquiladora Miniara, SA de CV
    The Good Gel Antibacterial Gel Hand Sanitizer 07/02/2020*
    EskBiochem SA de CV
    The Honeykeeper Hand Sanitizer 07/08/2020
    4E Brands North America LLC
    TriCleanz 07/30/2020
    Tritanium Labs LLC
    TriCleanz Tritanium Labs Hand Sanitizer 07/30/2020
    Tritanium Labs LLC
    Urbane Bath and Body Hand Sanitizer 07/02/2020
    Liberty International Distributors
    Vidanos Easy Cleaning Rentals Hand Sanitizer Agavespa Skincare 07/08/2020
    Vidanos Easy Cleaning Rentals
    Wave Hand Sanitizer Gel 07/02/2020
    C&A Marketing Inc.
  • Monday Blood Drive To Include COVID-19 Antibody Testing

    Monday Blood Drive To Include COVID-19 Antibody Testing

    Blood drive today at the Adams County Safe Room from 11:30 until 5:30

    Appointments Required! Click here to make your appointment for today’s blood drive in Natchez.

    Mississippi Blood Services is hosting the blood drive today.  As part of your donation, they will test your blood for COVID-19 antibodies.

    Here is what you need to know about COVID-19 antibody testing.

    Is the COVID-19 antibody test different from a diagnostic test?

    The COVID-19 antibody test does not test for the presence of COVID-19. The
    antibody test looks to see if the blood contains antibodies to the virus. The test
    does not check for the presence of an active COVID-19 infection.

    Do I need to donate blood to get the COVID-19 antibody test?

    Yes, in order to get the COVID-19 antibody test, a complete donation must be
    given. This test is available to donors that complete a whole blood, platelet or
    double red blood cell donation.

    If I test positive for the COVID-19 antibody, then what?

    We would encourage you to consider donating Convalescent Plasma. Plasma
    derived from donations that test positive for the COVID-19 antibody will likely
    be designated as convalescent plasma. Learn more about donating convalescent
    plasma by contacting Noreen Haley at nhaley@msblood.com.

    How will I receive my results after I donate?

    Your results will be sent to you via email within 1 week of your donation. You
    will need to make sure you provide your email to the phlebotomist during
    registration to ensure receipt of your results. IF you do not recieve your emailed
    results within 1 week of donation date, please email sates@msblood.com.

    Can previous donations be used to test for COVID-19 antibody?

    No. However stay tuned as we may offer antibody testing again in the near future.

     

     

  • University of Alabama students threw “COVID contest” parties

    University of Alabama students threw “COVID contest” parties

    Students put money in a pot and whoever got COVID first would get the cash.

    TUSCALOOSA, Ala. (AP) — Several college students in an Alabama city organized “COVID-19” parties as a contest to see who would get the virus first, officials said.

    Tuscaloosa City Councilor Sonya McKinstry said students hosted the parties to intentionally infect each other with the new coronavirus, news outlets reported.

    McKinstry said party organizers purposely invited guests who tested positive for COVID-19. She said the students put money in a pot and whoever got COVID first would get the cash.

    “It makes no sense,” McKinstry said. “They’re intentionally doing it.”

    Tuscaloosa Fire Chief Randy Smith confirmed the incidents to the City Council on Tuesday.

     The department thought the parties were rumors, but Smith said after some research, officials discovered the parties were real.

    “Not only do the doctors’ offices confirm it but the state confirmed they also had the same information,” Smith said.

    Smith did not say whether actions would be taken against the students. He also did not say which schools the students attend.

    Tuscaloosa is home to The University of Alabama and several other colleges.

    Tuscaloosa City Council members unanimously approved a mask requirement during a meeting Tuesday.

  • Hollowed out public health system faces more cuts amid virus

    Hollowed out public health system faces more cuts amid virus

    The U.S. public health system has been starved for decades and lacks the resources to confront the worst health crisis in a century.

    Marshaled against a virus that has sickened at least 2.6 million in the U.S., killed more than 126,000 people and cost tens of millions of jobs and $3 trillion in federal rescue money, state and local government health workers on the ground are sometimes paid so little, they qualify for public aid.

    They track the coronavirus on paper records shared via fax. Working seven-day weeks for months on end, they fear pay freezes, public backlash and even losing their jobs.

    Since 2010, spending for state public health departments has dropped by 16% per capita and spending for local health departments has fallen by 18%, according to a KHN and Associated Press analysis of government spending on public health. At least 38,000 state and local public health jobs have disappeared since the 2008 recession, leaving a skeletal workforce for what was once viewed as one of the world’s top public health systems.

    KHN, also known as Kaiser Health News, and AP interviewed more than 150 public health workers, policymakers and experts, analyzed spending records from hundreds of state and local health departments, and surveyed statehouses. On every level, the investigation found, the system is underfunded and under threat, unable to protect the nation’s health.

    Robert Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in an interview in April that his “biggest regret” was “that our nation failed over decades to effectively invest in public health.”

    So when this outbreak arrived — and when, according to public health experts, the federal government bungled its response — hollowed-out state and local health departments were ill-equipped to step into the breach.

    Over time, their work had received so little support that they found themselves without direction, disrespected, ignored, even vilified. The desperate struggle against COVID-19 became increasingly politicized and grew more difficult.

    States, cities and counties in dire straits have begun laying off and furloughing their limited staff, and even more devastation looms, as states reopen and cases surge. Historically, even when money pours in following crises such as Zika and H1N1, it disappears after the emergency subsides. Officials fear the same thing is happening now.

    “We don’t say to the fire department, ‘Oh, I’m sorry. There were no fires last year, so we’re going to take 30% of your budget away.’ That would be crazy, right?” said Dr. Gianfranco Pezzino, the health officer in Shawnee County, Kansas. “But we do that with public health, day in and day out.”

    Ohio’s Toledo-Lucas County Health Department spent $17 million, or $40 per person, in 2017.

    Jennifer Gottschalk, 42, works for the county as an environmental health supervisor. When the coronavirus struck, the county’s department was so short-staffed that her duties included overseeing campground and pool inspections, rodent control and sewage programs, while also supervising outbreak preparedness for a community of more than 425,000 people.

    When Gottschalk and five colleagues fell ill with COVID-19, she found herself fielding calls about a COVID-19 case from her hospital bed, then working through her home isolation. She only stopped when her coughing was too severe to talk on calls.

    “You have to do what you have to do to get the job done,” Gottschalk said.

    Now, after months of working with hardly a day off, she says the job is wearing on her. So many lab reports on coronavirus cases came in, the office fax machine broke. She faces a backlash from the community over coronavirus restrictions and there are countless angry phone calls.

    Things could get worse; possible county budget cuts loom.

    But Toledo-Lucas is no outlier. Public health ranks low on the nation’s financial priority list. Nearly two-thirds of Americans live in counties that spend more than twice as much on policing as they spend on nonhospital health care, which includes public health.

    More than three-quarters of Americans live in states that spend less than $100 per person annually on public health. Spending ranges from $32 in Louisiana to $263 in Delaware, according to data provided to KHN and AP by the State Health Expenditure Dataset project.

    That money represents less than 1.5% of most states’ total spending, with half of it passed down to local health departments.

    The share of spending devoted to public health belies its multidimensional role. Agencies are legally bound to provide a broad range of services, from vaccinations and restaurant inspections to protection against infectious disease. Distinct from the medical care system geared toward individuals, the public health system focuses on the health of communities at large.

    “Public health loves to say: When we do our job, nothing happens. But that’s not really a great badge,” said Scott Becker, chief executive officer of the Association of Public Health Laboratories. “We test 97% of America’s babies for metabolic or other disorders. We do the water testing. You like to swim in the lake and you don’t like poop in there? Think of us.”

    But the public doesn’t see the disasters they thwart. And it’s easy to neglect the invisible.

    A HISTORY OF DEPRIVATION

    The local health department was a well-known place in the 1950s and 1960s, when Harris Pastides, president emeritus of the University of South Carolina, was growing up in New York City.

    “My mom took me for my vaccines. We would get our injections there for free. We would get our polio sugar cubes there for free,” said Pastides, an epidemiologist. “In those days, the health departments had a highly visible role in disease prevention.”

    The United States’ decentralized public health system, which matches federal funding and expertise with local funding, knowledge and delivery, was long the envy of the world, said Saad Omer, director of the Yale Institute for Global Health.

    “A lot of what we’re seeing right now could be traced back to the chronic funding shortages,” Omer said. “The way we starve our public health system, the way we have tried to do public health outcomes on the cheap in this country.”

    In Scott County, Indiana, when preparedness coordinator Patti Hall began working at the health department 34 years ago, it ran a children’s clinic and a home health agency with several nurses and aides. But over time, the children’s clinic lost funding and closed. Medicare changes paved the way for private services to replace the home health agency. Department staff dwindled in the 1990s and early 2000s. The county was severely outgunned when rampant opioid use and needle sharing sparked an outbreak of HIV in 2015.

    Besides just five full-time and one part-time county public health positions, there was only one doctor in the outbreak’s epicenter of Austin. Indiana’s then-Gov. Mike Pence, now leading the nation’s coronavirus response as vice president, waited 29 days after the outbreak was announced to sign an executive order allowing syringe exchanges. At the time, a state official said that only five people from agencies across Indiana were available to help with HIV testing in the county.

    The HIV outbreak exploded into the worst ever to hit rural America, infecting more than 230 people.

    At times, the federal government has promised to support local public health efforts, to help prevent similar calamities. But those promises were ephemeral.

    Two large sources of money established after Sept. 11, 2001 — the Public Health Emergency Preparedness program and the Hospital Preparedness Program — were gradually chipped away.

    The Affordable Care Act established the Prevention and Public Health Fund, which was supposed to reach $2 billion annually by 2015. The Obama administration and Congress raided it to pay for other priorities, including a payroll tax cut. The Trump administration is pushing to repeal the ACA, which would eliminate the fund, said Carolyn Mullen, senior vice president of government affairs and public relations at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.

    Former Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, a Democrat who championed the fund, said he was furious when the Obama White House took billions from it, breaking what he said was an agreement.

    “I haven’t spoken to Barack Obama since,” Harkin said.

    If the fund had remained untouched, an additional $12.4 billion would eventually have flowed to local and state health departments.

    But local and state leaders also did not prioritize public health over the years.

    In Florida, for example, 2% of state spending goes to public health. Spending by local health departments in the state fell 39%, from a high of $57 in inflation-adjusted dollars per person in the late 1990s to $35 per person last year.

    In North Carolina, Wake County’s public health workforce dropped from 882 in 2007 to 614 a decade later, even as the population grew by 30%.

    In Detroit, the health department had 700 employees in 2009, then was effectively disbanded during the city’s bankruptcy proceedings. It’s been built back up, but today still has only 200 workers for 670,000 residents.

    Many departments rely heavily on disease-specific grant funding, creating unstable and temporary positions. The CDC’s core budget, some of which goes to state and local health departments, has essentially remained flat for a decade. Federal money currently accounts for 27% of local public health spending.

    Years of such financial pressure increasingly pushed workers in this predominantly female workforce toward retirement or the private sector and kept potential new hires away.

    More than a fifth of public health workers in local or regional departments outside big cities earned $35,000 or less a year in 2017, as did 9% in big city departments, according to research by the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials and the de Beaumont Foundation.

    Even before the pandemic, nearly half of public health workers planned to retire or leave their organizations for other reasons in the next five years. Poor pay topped the list of reasons.

    Armed with a freshly minted bachelor’s degree, Julia Crittendon took a job two years ago as a disease intervention specialist with Kentucky’s state health department. She spent her days gathering detailed information about people’s sexual partners to fight the spread of HIV and syphilis. She tracked down phone numbers and drove hours to pick up reluctant clients.

    The mother of three loved the work, but made so little money that she qualified for Medicaid, the federal-state insurance program for America’s poorest. Seeing no opportunity to advance, she left.

    “We’re like the redheaded stepchildren, the forgotten ones,” said Crittendon, 46.

    Such low pay is endemic, with some employees qualifying for the nutrition program for new moms and babies that they administer. People with the training for many public health jobs, which can include a bachelor’s or master’s degree, can make much more money in the private health care sector, robbing the public departments of promising recruits.

    Dr. Tom Frieden, a former CDC director, said the agency “intentionally underpaid people” in a training program that sent early-career professionals to state and local public health departments to build the workforce.

    “If we paid them at the very lowest level at the federal scale,” he said in an interview, “they would have to take a 10-20% pay cut to continue on at the local health department.”

    As low pay sapped the workforce, budget cuts sapped services.

    In Alaska, the Division of Public Health’s spending dropped 9% from 2014 to 2018 and staffing fell by 82 positions in a decade to 426. Tim Struna, chief of public health nursing in Alaska, said declines in oil prices in the mid-2010s led the state to make cuts to public health nursing services. They eliminated well-child exams for children over 6, scaled back searches for the partners of people with certain sexually transmitted infections and limited reproductive health services to people 29 and younger.

    A DECIMATED SURGE CAPACITY

    As the public health director for the Kentucky River District Health Department in rural Appalachia, Scott Lockard is battling the pandemic with 3G cell service, paper records and one-third of the employees the department had 20 years ago.

    He redeployed his nurse administrator to work round-the-clock on contact tracing, alongside the department’s school nurse and the tuberculosis and breastfeeding coordinator. His home health nurse, who typically visits older patients, now works on preparedness plans. But residents aren’t making it easy on them.

    “They’re not wearing masks, and they’re throwing social distancing to the wind,” Lockard said in mid-June, as cases surged. “We’re paying for it.”

    Even with more staff since the HIV outbreak, Indiana’s Scott County Health Department employees worked evenings, weekends and holidays to deal with the pandemic, including outbreaks at a food packing company and a label manufacturer. Indiana spends $37 a person on public health.

    “When you get home, the phone never stops, the emails and texts never stop,” said Hall, the preparedness coordinator.

    All the while, she and her colleagues worry about keeping HIV under control and preventing drug overdoses from rising. Other health problems don’t just disappear because there is a pandemic.

    “We’ve been used to being able to `MacGyver’ everything on a normal day, and this is not a normal day,” said Amanda Mehl, the public health administrator for Boone County, Illinois, citing a TV show.

    Pezzino, whose department in Kansas serves Topeka and Shawnee County, said he had been trying to hire an epidemiologist, who would study, track and analyze data on health issues, since he came to the department 14 years ago. Finally, less than three years ago, they hired one. She just left, and he thinks it will be nearly impossible to find another.

    While epidemiologists are nearly universal in departments serving large populations, hardly any departments serving smaller populations have one. Only 28% of local health departments have an epidemiologist or statistician.

    Strapped departments are now forced to spend money on contact tracers, masks and gloves to keep their workers safe and to do basic outreach.

    Melanie Hutton, administrator for the Cooper County Public Health Center in rural Missouri, pointed out the local ambulance department got $18,000, and the fire and police departments got masks to fight COVID-19.

    “For us, not a nickel, not a face mask,” she said. “We got (5) gallons of homemade hand sanitizer made by the prisoners.”

    Public health workers are leaving in droves. At least 34 state and local public health leaders have announced their resignation, retired or been fired in 17 states since April, a KHN/AP review found. Others face threats and armed demonstrators.

    Ohio’s Gottschalk said the backlash has been overwhelming.

    “Being yelled at by residents for almost two hours straight last week on regulations I cannot control left me feeling completely burned out,” she said in mid-June.

    Many are putting their health at risk. In Prince George’s County, Maryland, public health worker Chantee Mack died after, family and co-workers believe, she and several colleagues contracted the disease in the office.

    A DIFFICULT ROAD AHEAD

    Pence, in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal on June 16, said the public health system was “far stronger” than it was when coronavirus hit.

    It’s true that the federal government this year has allocated billions for public health in response to the pandemic, according to the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. That includes more than $13 billion to state and local health departments, for activities including contact tracing, infection control and technology upgrades.

    A KHN/AP review found that some state and local governments are also pledging more money for public health. Alabama’s budget for next year, for example, includes $35 million more for public health than it did this year.

    But overall, spending is about to be slashed again as the boom-bust cycle continues.

    In most states, the new budget year begins July 1, and furloughs, layoffs and pay freezes have already begun in some places. Tax revenues evaporated during lockdowns, all but ensuring there will be more. At least 14 states have already cut health department budgets or positions or were actively considering such cuts in June, according to a KHN/AP review.

    Since the pandemic began, Michigan temporarily cut most of its state health workers’ hours by one-fifth. Pennsylvania required more than 65 of its 1,200 public health workers to go on temporary leave, and others lost their jobs. Knox County, Tennessee, furloughed 26 out of 260 workers for eight weeks.

    Frieden, formerly of the CDC, said it’s “stunning” that the U.S. is furloughing public health workers amid a pandemic. The country should demand the resources for public health, he said, just the way it does for the military.

    “This is about protecting Americans,” Frieden said.

     

     

     

     

    By LAUREN WEBER, LAURA UNGAR, MICHELLE R. SMITH, HANNAH RECHT and ANNA MARIA BARRY-JESTER

  • NOT REAL NEWS: A Look At What Didn’t Happen This Week

    NOT REAL NEWS: A Look At What Didn’t Happen This Week

    A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week.

    CLAIM: Wearing face masks can cause fungal and bacterial pneumonia.

    THE FACTS: There’s no evidence that normal use of face masks can cause fungal or bacterial infections. On June 19, a Florida congressional candidate posted a tweet claiming that wearing face masks could lead to pneumonia. “Excessive use of face masks causes fungal and bacterial pneumonia,” wrote Jessi Melton, a conservative business owner who is running to represent Florida’s 22nd Congressional District. The false post had over 16,000 retweets as of Wednesday. Davidson Hamer, an infectious disease specialist at Boston University, said he was unaware of any harm that comes from wearing masks besides discomfort. “There’s no evidence of masks leading to fungal or bacterial infections of the upper airway or the lower airway as in pneumonia,” said Hamer, who is also a professor of global health and medicine at the university. Hamer noted that bacterial growth could occur, in theory, if someone wore a mask that was already contaminated with moisture and became moldy. “Theoretically, it could happen, but it’s highly unlikely with just typical mask use,” he said in a phone call with the AP. However, he added, paper masks that become visibly wet should be discarded. Anne Monroe, an internal medicine physician and epidemiologist at George Washington University’s Milken Institute School of Public Health, agreed: “There’s no evidence to back up this claim. Digging into it a little bit more, in terms of mask use, it is important to follow general sanitation guidelines.” She said it’s important that disposable masks be discarded and cloth masks be washed. “The idea that contamination could cause fungal pneumonia is not a valid conclusion,” she said. Monroe agreed with Hamer that it’s “potentially theoretical,” but that it has not been documented. The real danger, Hamer said, is “spreading incorrect information like this, especially at a time when we really need to be encouraging more people to wear masks.” The number of confirmed new coronavirus cases per day in the U.S. hit an all-time high of 40,000 Friday — eclipsing the mark set during one of the deadliest stretches in late April.

    ___

    CLAIM: A May 20 tweet sent and later deleted by U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat representing New York, argues that governors should keep businesses closed until after the presidential election because economic recovery will help get President Donald Trump reelected.

    THE FACTS: The tweet was fabricated. It does not appear in archived versions of Ocasio-Cortez’s Twitter feed or in databases that track deleted tweets by politicians. The congresswoman also knocked down the tweet on her Twitter feed: “I usually don’t tweet to correct fake posts about me bc the right circulates so many, but needless to say the alleged ‘deleted’ reopening tweet people are saying I wrote is a photoshopped fake being circulated by Republicans.” On Tuesday, June 23 — the same day as New York state’s primary election — an image of the tweet supposedly posted by Ocasio-Cortez circulated rapidly on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. “It’s vital that Governors maintain restrictions on businesses until after the November Elections because economic recovery will help Trump be re-elected,” the fabricated tweet read. “A few business closures or job losses is a small price to pay to be free from his presidency. #KeepUsClosed.” Social media users sharing the image in Facebook groups and other social media forums claimed the congresswoman deleted the tweet after it had already amassed more than 20,000 retweets. They used the image to criticize the congresswoman and her intentions on the same day she was defending her seat in a Democratic primary election. “Lil’ miss enemy of the people strikes again,” one Instagram user said. But an investigation into the supposed tweet reveals there is no evidence that it ever appeared on Ocasio-Cortez’s Twitter timeline. Archived versions of her account from the day it was allegedly posted don’t show the tweet. Neither do databases that track deleted tweets by politicians. There’s also no indication that the tweet was re-shared by anyone between May 20, the date on the supposed tweet, and June 23. A tool that tracks the first Twitter user to post certain words and phrases showed that the message didn’t appear on the site until June 23.

    ___

    CLAIM: In North Carolina, you can be charged with a class H felony if you have a concealed carry permit and carry while wearing a mask, according to state statute 14-12.

    THE FACTS: North Carolina state statutes do not prohibit people with permits to carry concealed guns from doing so while wearing a mask. As counties in North Carolina began requiring masks to prevent spread of the coronavirus, posts online have circulated suggesting that gun owners permitted to carry a concealed gun would face a felony charge if they carry while wearing a mask. North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper announced Wednesday that face coverings would be required while out in public saying that “people must wear face coverings when in public places, indoors or outdoors.” Posts circulating on social media warn that those who decide to concealed carry and wear a mask can be charged with a felony. “Once you have a felony you can no longer carry,” stated one post with more than 5,000 shares on Facebook. The posts online referenced “NC Gen. Statute 14-12” as the reason state residents with “concealed carry” permits could not carry their gun and wear a mask at the same time. But in May, as part of its Covid-19 Recovery Act, the North Carolina state legislature made a temporary exception to the state’s mask law due to public health concerns. The bill also stipulates that a person wearing a mask shall remove the mask upon request of a law enforcement officer. The law dates to the 1950s, when masks were banned in public. Several states passed such laws at the time in response to the Ku Klux Klan. “We are not aware of any statutes that would prohibit people from continuing to concealed carry, which is their legal right in North Carolina, and also wear a mask to protect themselves,” Patrick Ryan, spokesman for North Carolina Senate leader Phil Berger, said.

    ___

    CLAIM: NASCAR allows a Black Lives Matter-themed car, but won’t allow its audience to wear MAGA hats or other Trump clothing.

    THE FACTS: The auto racing association has not banned Trump-themed clothing, according to NASCAR spokesman Mike Forde. This claim emerged as a piece of satire on June 13, days after NASCAR announced it would ban the Confederate flag from its events and properties. Daily World Update, a self-described satire website, published a piece that said NASCAR would no longer allow “Make America Great Again” hats or other political clothing “in order to stem any conflicts resulting from disagreements among ‘politically charged’ attendees.” The trouble came when Facebook users began spreading the claim as real. Over the last several days, posts claiming NASCAR has instituted a MAGA hat and Trump clothing ban have eclipsed 6 million views and been shared more than 100,000 times on Facebook. “WOW HOW TO DIG YOUR OWN GRAVE AND JUMP IN : NASCAR HAS NOW BANNED ALL MAGA HATS AND TRUMP CLOTHING !!! JUST WOW,” one post read. Many other posts claimed NASCAR was hypocritical for allowing its athlete Bubba Wallace to drive a Black Lives Matter-themed car while banning Trump gear. Forde confirmed that beyond the Confederate flag ban, people at NASCAR events are free to wear political clothing as they please. “There is no ban on maga hats or Trump clothing,” he said in an email.

    ____

    CLAIM: In a Facebook post, tennis star Serena Williams said she was sick of COVID-19, “black vs. white,” “gay vs. straight” and “Democrats vs. Republicans,” and that people should “stop thrusting your beliefs on others.”

    THE FACTS: This is a case of mistaken identity. Another Facebook user named Serena Williams shared the comments. Screenshots of her post are being shared on social media, mistaking her for the tennis athlete. In late June, Facebook and Twitter users began sharing a screenshot of the Facebook post, which showed the name Serena Williams next to a message about COVID-19 and political tension. “I’m sick of COVID-19. I’m sick of black vs. white. I’m sick of Democrats vs. Republicans. I’m sick of gay vs. straight. I’m sick of Christians vs atheists. I’m REALLY sick of the media. I’m sick of no one being allowed to think what they want & feel what they do without offending someone,” said the message, which went on for three more paragraphs, encouraging people to be tolerant of others’ opinions. ”If you can’t handle the fact that you may have a friend that has opposing views as you then you are not any better than the bigots and the racists. I don’t have to agree with everything you believe to be a decent human being & your friend,” it concluded, with a heart emoji at the end. But the actual Facebook user who posted the opinions on Sunday, June 14, is not the athlete Serena Williams — they just happen to share the same name. “Nope, not THAT Serena Williams,” the user’s Facebook bio reads. The message in the post appears to have originated with a different Facebook user who shared the same words on Facebook on June 2. The tennis star Serena Williams has been outspoken on social media about racial injustice, denouncing racism on Twitter and hosting discussions on the topic on her Instagram page. Williams’ publicist confirmed the tennis star didn’t make the post.

    ____

    CLAIM: Photo shows a massive crowd in a parking lot at President Trump’s rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

    THE FACTS: The photo shows an event in Arlington, Virginia, not Trump’s rally in Tulsa. On Saturday, June 21, as Trump prepared for a rally in Tulsa, posts began circulating online sharing a photo of a red car passing a parking lot crowded with people. “Look at Tulsa now!!!!” stated one Facebook post with more than 3,000 shares. In reality, the photo shows the North Pentagon parking lot in Arlington, Virginia, a location that has been used by the Rolling Thunder, a group that honors prisoners of war and service members killed in action, for their annual motorcycle demonstration. Similar photos on the Rolling Thunder Washington, DC Inc., Facebook page match the parking lot, surrounding greenery and a building in the background of the one being misrepresented online. Rolling Thunder Washington, DC confirmed to The Associated Press that the photo appeared to show a Rolling Thunder event in a Pentagon parking lot. Photos of the event online also show the Washington Monument in the background. “First Amendment Demonstration Run – Bikes leave the North Pentagon parking lot to begin their run through the Mall area,” Rolling Thunder organizers wrote on their website, showing a map of the area. The photo was widely misrepresented on social media, including by Donald Trump Jr., who posted it to Facebook the day of his father’s rally. “The Silent Majority is about to GET LOUD,” he wrote. The misrepresented Arlington photo was labeled: “Line for today’s Trump rally.” One Instagram post sharing the misrepresented photos received about 30,000 likes. Posts falsely identifying the photo also circulated widely following reports that turnout at Trump’s Tulsa rally on Saturday was far lower than anticipated. According to estimates by the city’s fire marshal’s office, about 6,200 people gathered in the BOK center for the rally. The center will hold about 19,000 people. Other posts shared the photo in a side-by-side comparison with a photo that appeared to show poor turnout at a June 17 campaign event for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden in Darby, Pennsylvania. “A Joe Biden ‘rally’ this week,” said the caption with the photo taken at the Biden event, which was closed to the public and allowed only journalists and nine official attendees.

    ___

    CLAIM: Photo depicts Japanese police spraying looters and rioters with blue dye so they could be identified and arrested later.

    THE FACTS: The photo is miscaptioned and being shared out of context. A reverse-image search reveals it actually shows Hong Kong police spraying pro-democracy protesters in 2019 with water containing blue dye. The photo of people on a street being drenched with blue-tinted water circulated widely on Facebook with a false caption this week, reaching more than 6 million people. “Japan sprays looters and rioters with indelible blue dye so they can be identified and arrested later,” a caption with the photo read. “How about it America?” The misrepresented photo was being shared in the wake of nationwide protests in the U.S. following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis. Floyd, who is Black, died May 25 after a white officer used his knee to pin him down by the neck. Peaceful protests supporting the Black Lives Matter movement have erupted in Japan in the past month — but this image doesn’t show one of them. Instead, an internet search for the photo reveals it was taken in Hong Kong in 2019, amid protests sparked by a proposed law that would allow suspects there to be extradited to mainland China to stand trial. During the protests in 2019, Hong Kong police used water cannons with blue dye in them, The Associated Press reported at the time.

    ___

    CLAIM: “Congratulations, Dr. Michelle Obama! Since her husband left the White House, and her children are out of the house, Mrs. Obama decided to complete her ‘PHD in law.’”

    THE FACTS: Social media users are posting Facebook photos of Michelle Obama and falsely congratulating her for supposedly completing a new law degree after leaving the White House in 2016. The posts, many of which were made in May or June, have received thousands of shares on Facebook. Obama was already accomplished on this front, having earned a juris doctor from Harvard Law School in 1988, decades before her husband assumed the presidency in 2008. She earned that degree three years after finishing her bachelor’s degree at Princeton University. A spokeswoman for Obama confirmed in an email to The Associated Press that she has not earned any new degrees since leaving the White House in 2016. Obama has received several honorary degrees from universities after giving commencement speeches, including honorary doctorate degrees from Oregon State University in 2012, Bowie State University in 2013 and Jackson State University in 2016. Since the end of her time as first lady, Obama released a memoir, “Becoming,” in 2018 that was followed by a 34-city book tour that concluded last year, and a Netflix documentary was unveiled this year.

    ___

    This is part of The Associated Press’ ongoing effort to fact-check misinformation that is shared widely online, including work with Facebook to identify and reduce the circulation of false stories on the platform.

    ___

    Find all AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck

  • 1,300-Plus Leap In Reported Louisiana Coronavirus Cases

    1,300-Plus Leap In Reported Louisiana Coronavirus Cases

    Friday marked the second one-day spike of more than 1,300 COVID-19 cases this week.

    NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The number of reported COVID-19 cases in Louisiana has taken another large one-day jump, increasing Friday by more than 1,300 as the number of people hospitalized with the disease caused by the new coronavirus continued upward.

    The state reported a total of 54,769 confirmed cases as of midday. The death toll was 3,077, up by 26 from Thursday.

    Some of the growth in known case numbers can be attributed to increased testing. However, the number of people sick enough to be hospitalized — considered a key indicator that the virus is spreading — went up to 700. The figure is down from nearly 2,000 in April but up from a low of 542 on June 13.

    The increasing numbers led Gov. John Bel Edwards this week to put off a further easing of restrictions on public gatherings and some business activity. Edwards has promised stepped up enforcement on businesses that aren’t complying with virus-related restrictions on capacity and requirements that employees dealing with the public wear masks.

    Baton Rouge’s mayor unveiled a phone number and website for people to anonymously report businesses that don’t comply with the rules.